BREAKING: The United States Has Basically Declared War On Russia According To A Former CIA Agent

Bryan Dean Wright, a former CIA agent, says the US has already declared war on Russia. As Russia’s war with Ukraine continues, the former CIA operative went on Fox News and chatted with presenter Tucker Carlson about the current state of affairs between the US and Russia, according to Mediaite.

Civilians confront the full fury of one of the world’s most powerful militaries, but Ukrainian soldiers are putting up a valiant fight. None of this is likely to be doable without Western assistance, given Ukraine is not a particularly affluent country. American-made missiles, weapons ammo, and other critical pieces of equipment have aided the country’s efforts to block Russia’s progress.

Regarding Tucker Carlson Tonight, Wright told Carlson that the United States’ arming of Ukraine is tantamount to a declaration of war. “The danger of a hot conflict is real, and it is becoming more serious by the day,” he warned. A “hot war,” as opposed to a “cold war,” would include US and Russian forces firing at each other.

“What I’m asking America to do tonight is set aside their animosity for Putin or Zelensky, or Ukraine or Russia,” he stated. He claimed that the United States’ assistance to Ukraine is equal to a declaration of war.

“Please understand that we have effectively declared war on Russia.” We’ve completed three tasks. For starters, we have decimated their economy. Second, we’re cramming in all of these weaponry. Third, there hasn’t been much coverage of this. We are providing tactical intelligence to the Ukrainian government in order for an X to be placed on the forehead of a Russian soldier and Russian equipment.” the former agent said.

“Our spies and satellites are assisting the Ukrainians in the assassination of Russians. “As a result, we have declared war,” he stated. He stated that the Pentagon would determine the nature of a battle with Russia, but maintained that the US was beaten in Afghanistan by “goat herders.”

“But it involves young people dying, and we should talk about that as well, because our folks in Washington aren’t going to be the ones sacrificing,” he remarked. Russia notified the US last week that it considered American convoys transporting weaponry to Ukraine to be acceptable military targets.

“We have warned the US that the US-orchestrated inundation of Ukraine with weaponry from various nations is not only a risky maneuver, but also one that makes these convoys acceptable targets,” Russia’s deputy foreign minister Sergey Ryabkov stated, according to The Epoch Times.

The Department of Defense (DoD) of the United States declined to comment. The State Department of the United States did not reply to a request for comment. According to a senior US defense official, there have been “no indicators” of Russians targeting weapons shipments.

Ukraine has received armaments from the US, notably anti-tank and anti-armor missiles. Such behaviors, according to Ryabkov, are “escalatory.” “Despite all the incantations that they are incredibly responsible individuals who evaluate every step they make,” the deputy foreign minister stated, “the escalatory component of Washington’s strategy certainly prevails.” When asked why sending planes from Poland to Ukraine was deemed “high risk,” Pentagon spokesperson John Kirby outlined the reasoning behind the decision.

“Could you perhaps provide a bit more detail on this high-risk assessment?” “Is there anything in the public domain that you could identify that explains why these combat aircraft transfers will be regarded as high risk?” the reporter said. “And, you know, is this a new redline for the US government in terms of what it will and will not do to help Ukraine?” “Or is this connected to the pre-existing red line of no fresh soldiers even in airspace?” he asked.

“We’re not going to draw a line here, Phil. We’re providing you an honest appraisal of how we arrived at our findings concerning this specific idea of MIG-29s being transferred to US custody and subsequently handed over to Ukraine.

“That’s why we’re here,” the spokesperson explained. “That’s what — that’s the choice we made. As I stated in my response to the Court, we are continually with every decision we make, with every piece of content and technology that we provide. We are always weighing the necessity and the possible danger of meeting that need. And we will continue to do so in the future.

“And I’m not going to get into details.” The sausage-making process through which this specific choice was made. I went over the three reasons why the Secretary feels confident in this choice. And with those three arguments, I’ll leave it at that,” he added.