Chief Justice John Roberts of the United States Supreme Court replied to the leak of a draft opinion indicating that a majority of justices had decided to overturn the 1973 Roe v. Wade decision, which legalized abortion in all 50 states. According to Fox News, the United States Supreme Court agreed that the leaked document was genuine, but stressed that it was only a draft and not the court’s final decision.
“As part of the Court’s secret deliberative process, Justices share draft opinions internally on a regular basis. “While the document detailed in yesterday’s reports is real,” the court stated, “it does not constitute a decision by the Court or the final view of any member on the issues in the case.”
Do you trust the main stream media?
"*" indicates required fields
The Supreme Court responded to a report of a draft opinion that, if published, might overturn Roe v. Wade, with Chief Justice John Roberts sharply criticizing the leak to the public, according to Fox News. The court recognized that the leaked document is genuine in a brief statement, but stressed that it is only a draft and that the court has not reached a final judgment on the case.
“Justices often exchange draft opinions among themselves as part of the Court’s secret deliberate process. Despite the fact that the document reported in yesterday’s reports is genuine, it does not constitute a Court judgment or any member’s final view on the issues in the case” According to the court.
In a statement released alongside the court’s press release, Roberts stated that he has asked the Marshal of the Court to look into the incident and discover the individual who leaked the document to Politico. Roberts also dismissed the idea that the leak might be used as a political ploy to affect the case’s result.
“It will not succeed in undermining the integrity of our activities to the degree that this breach of the Court’s confidences was meant to do so. The Court’s work will not be harmed in any way “According to Roberts. The top justice further stressed how uncommon such a leak is, owing to the court’s staff’s dedication and professionalism.
"*" indicates required fields
“We are fortunate at the Court to have a workforce – permanent workers and law clerks alike – who are fiercely committed to the institution and the rule of law,” he added. “Employees of the Court have a long and illustrious history of maintaining the judicial process’s confidentiality and sustaining the Court’s confidence.
This was a one-of-a-kind and flagrant breach of trust, and it was an insult to the Court and the community of public employees who work here.” He pointed out that if the leaker’s goal was to persuade justices to change their decisions, he would be unsuccessful.
“To the degree that this violation of the Court’s confidences was intended to jeopardize the integrity of our activities, it failed. “The Court’s work will not be harmed in any way,” Roberts promised. He went on to say that leaks from the nation’s highest court are uncommon and that the justices are fortunate to have a staff that is mainly loyal. “We are fortunate at the Court to have a workforce – permanent workers and law clerks alike – who are fiercely committed to the institution and the rule of law,” he added.
“Court staff have a long and illustrious history of maintaining the judicial process’s confidentiality and keeping the Court’s confidence.” This was a one-of-a-kind and flagrant breach of trust, and it was an insult to the Court and the community of public employees who work here.” Roberts’ comment comes after Politico obtained a draft majority decision written by Justice Samuel Alito.
“The draft opinion is a full-throated, unabashed denunciation of the 1973 judgment guaranteeing federal constitutional protections for abortion rights, as well as a second 1992 case – Planned Parenthood v. Casey – that substantially upheld the right,” Politico said. “Roe was egregiously incorrect from the outset,” Alito stated.
“As a result, we believe that the Constitution does not grant a right to abortion.” “We hold that Roe and Casey must be overturned,” he said in the “Opinion of the Court” text. “It’s past time to pay attention to the Constitution and restore the subject of abortion to the people’s elected representatives,” she says.
According to Politico, In the past, deliberations on contentious matters were haphazard. As draft opinions circulate, justices can and do change their votes, and key judgments can be subject to many versions and vote-trading, sometimes until only days before they are announced.
The court’s decision will not be official until it is published, which is expected to happen within the next two months. The ruling’s immediate effect, as written in February, would be to remove a half-century of federal constitutional protection of abortion rights and let each state determine whether to restrict or prohibit abortion. It’s unclear whether the draft has been revised since then.
Conservatives requested a probe into the leak to find out who was responsible and hold them accountable. They also accused the leaker of undermining the nation’s top court’s integrity. A former federal prosecutor and Fox News contributor Andrew McCarthy tweeted, “If this information is accurate, the Court should publish its judgment immediately now.” “Otherwise, the dreadful leak triumphs. That’s what I’d say if my team lost. We will lose the Court if the Court’s procedure is compromised. To those of us who live in the country, it should be unacceptable.”