BREAKING: After Calling For More Government Regulation Of Social Media, Former Secretary Of State And Former First Lady Hillary Clinton Is Publicly Mocked

Photo Source: feedproxy.google.com

Former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton has been chastised for a recent tweet in which she urged for more social media regulation. After suggesting that the United States should follow the European Union in establishing rules to make social media corporations accountable for “disinformation” on their platforms, the 2016 Democratic presidential contender was roasted.

“For far too long, technological platforms have amplified falsehood and extremism with no responsibility.” The EU is gearing up to take action. “Before it’s too late, I encourage our transatlantic friends to conclude the Digital Services Act and strengthen global democracy,” she added.

This is the same individual whose former campaign attorney was charged in the Trump/Russia connection phony probe by Special Counsel John Durham. EU approves historic measure to make social media platforms liable for unlawful information, according to Yahoo News. The European Union has adopted new rules that would put pressure on major digital companies like as Meta, Google, and Twitter to police unlawful information on their platforms or face billion-dollar fines.

The EU struck an early Saturday agreement in Brussels on the Digital Services Act, a historic regulation mandating corporations to more aggressively regulate their material and immediately remove anything deemed damaging or unlawful after 16 hours of discussions.

EU President Ursula von der Leyen tweeted, “Our new laws will safeguard individuals online, preserve freedom of expression, and provide possibilities for businesses.” “In the EU, what is unlawful offline will be essentially prohibited online. A powerful message for individuals, businesses, and countries all across the world.”

The historic decision comes more than a year after the EU presented the European Parliament with the Digital Services Act (DSA) and the Digital Markets Act (DMA), both of which were adopted by the EU last month and aim to limit big tech’s marketing dominance. According to the EU, the legislation is the first of its kind in the world to address digital regulation.

The EU stated, “It aims to defend the digital environment against the dissemination of illicit information while also ensuring the preservation of users’ basic rights.” The regulation applies to platforms in the EU with more than 45 million monthly active users. A key provision of the legislation would restrict how major internet companies target customers with online adverts.

The DSA would effectively prohibit platforms from utilizing data based on a user’s gender, ethnicity, or religion to target them with algorithms. It would also be illegal to target youngsters with advertisements.

The new EU rule will have an impact on prominent user-generated content platforms such as Facebook and Instagram, which are owned by Meta, as well as Twitter, TikTok, and YouTube. It also comes at a time when US politicians are still debating how to get major digital corporations to do a better job of policing damaging content. On the opposite side of the Atlantic, the EU regulation was praised. “This is a watershed moment for global tech policy,” said Jim Steyer, CEO of Common Sense Media, a nonprofit advocacy group for children and families located in San Francisco.

Steyer called the measure “a watershed moment in the worldwide struggle to safeguard kids and families from the internet dangers caused by these uncontrolled platforms” in a statement. “European legislators have made a significant step toward making the internet safer for children and teenagers,” stated Steyer. “Lawmakers in our country must take a hard look in the mirror and act quickly to preserve our children and democratic future.” The moment has come for Congress and the Biden Administration to take action.”

“For too long, internet platforms have propagated falsehood and extremism with no responsibility,” Hillary Clinton, the former US Secretary of State and Democratic presidential contender, said in a tweet on Thursday. Disinformation and extremism have been perpetuated by internet platforms for far too long, with little accountability. The EU is gearing up to take action. Also on Thursday, former US President Barack Obama told a Stanford University audience that the internet industry requires stronger regulation to combat the rise of online misinformation, which is jeopardizing democracy.

Obama urged digital businesses to find a “north light” and “redesign” themselves, focusing less on “making money and growing divisiveness” and more on resolving the information problem he claims they contributed to. “Do we let our democracy wither, or do we improve it?” Obama had inquired. “You have a choice.” In a tweet, EU President Ursula von der Leyen stated, “Our new laws will safeguard individuals online, maintain freedom of expression, and provide possibilities for companies.” “In the EU, what is unlawful offline will essentially be prohibited online.” A powerful message for individuals, businesses, and countries all across the world.”

The rule “aims to defend the digital environment against the propagation of illicit information, as well as to ensure the preservation of users’ basic rights,” according to the EU. However, Hillary Clinton was hardly the only major American politician to push for increased social media regulation. In a tweet before an hour-long lecture on the matter at Stanford University, former President Barack Obama bemoaned, “Disinformation is a threat to our democracy, and will continue to be unless we work together to confront it.”

“It’s up to each of us to decide what we value and how to promote those ideals using the resources we’ve been given.” On Twitter, the former president stated, “I think we should utilize every weapon at our disposal to protect our greatest gift – a government of, by, and for the people – for decades to come.”

“Fixing the misinformation issue won’t fix everything that ails our democracy or mend the world’s fabric. But it can help re-establish the trust and unity that are necessary for democracy to thrive,” he added. Clinton, on the other hand, received a lot of flak on Twitter for her position. Kimberly Morin, a conservative writer, asked, “You know all about DISINFORMATION, don’t you?”

Conservative radio presenter Tim Young remarked, “Translated: Restrict the First Amendment so that Democrats can dominate the narrative without being challenged.” Another Twitter user wrote, “The Steele Dossier would want a word.” Another said, “Let’s start with accountability for your disinformation campaign.”

Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton stated, “Like her co-conspirator Obama, Hillary Clinton wants the government to police and restrict speech she doesn’t like.” According to conservative blogger Dan Gainor, @elonmusk has terrified the left so badly that they now want more government control over speech.

During former President Barack Obama’s address, it sure sounded like that. He said that it is not necessary for people to believe misleading information in order for it to harm democracy, but that having enough of it may do so. “All it takes is enough raw sewage to swamp a country’s public square,” the former president warned. “All you have to do is ask enough questions, disseminate enough dirt, and plant enough conspiracy theories so that people don’t know what to believe.”

And, according to him, it all starts with rewriting Section 230, which protects social media companies from what their users say. “Without some norms, the ramifications of this technology for our elections, our legal system, democracy, evidentiary rules, and our whole social order are terrifying and deep,” he warned. True. Democrats may lose if we do not stop individuals from speaking out.

Leave a Reply

%d bloggers like this: