MASSIVE LOSS FOR REPUBLICANS: As The United States Supreme Court Has Ruled In Favor Of Democrat Election Maps

REUTERS

It was recently reported by ConservativeBrief that the U.S. Supreme Court denied requests late on Monday night from Republicans challenging congressional maps in North Carolina and Pennsylvania that had been approved by politicized Democrat-controlled courts.

In a victory for Democrats, the nation’s highest court turned away efforts from Republicans in both battleground states to block state courted-ordered congressional districting plans.

The court has a 6-3 conservative majority. Conservative Justices Samuel Alito, Clarence Thomas, and Neil Gorsuch dissented from the action concerning North Carolina.

Conservative Justice Brett Kavanaugh sided with the liberal justices, saying he didn’t want to interfere in this year’s electoral process because it’s already underway.

In separate orders late Monday, the justices are allowing maps selected by each state’s Supreme Court to be in effect for the 2022 elections. Those maps are more favorable to Democrats than the ones drawn by the states’ legislatures.

As noted by Breitbart, this could be bad news for Republicans:

Donald Trump Poll

"*" indicates required fields

Will You Vote for Donald Trump in 2024?*
By Submitting Your Email, You Will Gain Access To Our Newsletter!

In North Carolina, the map most likely will give Democrats an additional House seat in 2023.

The Pennsylvania map also probably will lead to the election of more Democrats, the Republicans say, as the two parties battle for control of the U.S. House of Representatives in the midterm elections in November.

The justices provided no explanation for their actions, as is common in emergency applications on what is known as the “shadow docket.” While the high court did not stop the state court-ordered plans from being used in this year’s elections, four conservative justices indicated they want it to confront the issue that could dramatically limit the power of state courts over federal elections in the future. The Republicans argued that state courts lack the authority to second-guess legislatures’ decisions about the conduct of elections for Congress and the presidency.

“We will have to resolve this question sooner or later, and the sooner we do so, the better. This case presented a good opportunity to consider the issue, but unfortunately, the court has again found the occasion inopportune,” Justice Samuel Alito wrote in a dissent from the Supreme Court’s order, joined by Justices Neil Gorsuch and Clarence Thomas.

Kavanaugh said he didn’t want to interfere in this year’s electoral process, which already is underway.

“The state courts were involved because of partisan wrangling and lawsuits over congressional redistricting in both states, where the legislatures are controlled by Republicans, the governors are Democrats and the state Supreme Courts have Democratic majorities,” Breitbart noted.

“Pennsylvania, with a delegation of nine Democrats and nine Republicans, is losing a seat in the House following the 2020 Census. Republicans said the map they came up with would elect nine Democrats and eight Republicans. State courts eventually stepped in and approved a map that probably will elect 10 Democrats, the GOP argued,” the outlet added.

Leave a Reply

%d bloggers like this: