Mark Meadow’s Attorney Tells Hard Truth To Jan 6 Committee; The Contemplated Referral Would Be Contrary To Law Because Of Executive Privilege And Testimonial Immunity

Photo Source:

As of Monday in a letter, Meadows legal team asked the House Jan. 6 Committee not to refer him to the Department of Justice for contempt of Congress, arguing doing so “would be contrary to law, manifestly unjust, unwise, and unfair.”

“Meadows was previously cooperating with the committee’s investigation into the events surrounding the Jan. 6 attack on the Capitol by a mob of Trump supporters. But he later stopped working with the investigators and is now suing them. The committee is expected to recommend this week that the House refer him to the Department of Justice for contempt of Congress,” Fox News reported.about:blank

“The contemplated referral would be contrary to law because a good-faith invocation of executive privilege and testimonial immunity by a former senior executive official is not a crime,” Meadows’ lawyer, George Terwilliger, wrote.

“A referral to the Department of Justice based on such an invocation would ignore the statute’s legislative history and historical application, contravene well-established separation of powers principles, and improperly impute a criminal intent to a good-faith actor,” he added.

Fox News reported:

The letter also argues that referring Meadows for contempt would harm the institution of the presidency because it would tread on separation of powers and potentially make future presidential advisers reluctant to give their principal full and honest advice on key decisions. The Jan. 6 Committee, however, is aggressively asserting what it says are its constitutional powers of oversight and investigation. Chairman Bennie Thompson, D-Miss., and Ranking Member Liz Cheney, R-Wyo., said last week that Meadows’ claims of privilege do not extend to much of what he would discuss with the committee.

“Even as we litigate privilege issues, the Select Committee has numerous questions for Mr. Meadows about records he has turned over to the Committee with no claim of privilege, which include real-time communications with many individuals as the events of January 6th unfolded,” they said in a statement. “We also need to hear from him about voluminous official records stored in his personal phone and email accounts, which were required to be turned over to the National Archives in accordance with the Presidential Records Act.”

Leave a Reply

%d bloggers like this: