It turns out the FDA’s “full authorization” of the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine is not as “full” as advertised. In fact, it is about as legitimate as being “fully vaccinated” for Covid-19 despite purportedly needing “booster shots.”
As Becker News reported earlier, there were numerous signs the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine authorization documents were “off”:
But a closer examination of the “full authorization” documents has some Americans feeling deceived. There is the matter that Pfizer-BioNTech still appears to be afforded the legal protections that accompany Emergency Use Authorization, all while it purportedly has “full” FDA approval. How did the pharmaceutical company manage such a commercial ‘coup’?
Upon a more critical look at the documents, it now very much seems to be the case that the company, along with the indispensable aid of a complicit media and the Biden administration, has engaged in a classic bait-and-switch.
CNBC now provides confirmation of what many Americans have come to realize: It was a sham. Read the report:
If you experience severe side effects after getting a Covid vaccine, lawyers tell CNBC there is basically no one to blame in a U.S. court of law.
“It is very rare for a blanket immunity law to be passed,” said Rogge Dunn, a Dallas labor and employment attorney. “Pharmaceutical companies typically aren’t offered much liability protection under the law.“
You also can’t sue the Food and Drug Administration for authorizing a vaccine for emergency use, nor can you hold your employer accountable if they mandate inoculation as a condition of employment.
Congress created a fund specifically to help cover lost wages and out-of-pocket medical expenses for people who have been irreparably harmed by a “covered countermeasure,” such as a vaccine. But it is difficult to use and rarely pays. Attorneys say it has compensated less than 6% of the claims filed in the last decade.
Once again, only 6% of such vaccine injury claims are ever compensated. Making this even more bewildering, recently all three major international vaccine companies recently made a name change. As reported earlier:
All three major Covid-19 ‘vaccine’ manufacturers have unveiled new names for their ‘fully authorized’ jabs, even as two pharmaceutical companies await FDA approval for their products. Following the lead of Pfizer/BioNTech, which branded its ‘fully authorized’ (and oddly, unavailable) vaccine “Comirnaty,” the second and third largest manufacturers for Europe and Canada, Moderna and AstraZeneca, are also relabeling their Covid shots.
“The Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine is Comirnaty, the Moderna vaccine will be named SpikeVax, and the AstraZeneca vaccine will be named Vaxzevria,” Health Canada said in a tweet Thursday. “These are only name changes. There are no changes to the vaccines themselves,” Health Canada added in an attempt to quell confusion. But even vaccine supporters were confused by the name changes.
BeckerNews reached out to an attorney that specializes in vaccine injury cases who pointed out further information on the process. The Congressional fund is called the Comparison of Countermeasures Injury Compensation Program (CICP) to the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (VICP).
The reports for the Covid-19 vaccine side effects are done through the VAERS system, which is available through the FDA.
These are side effects that will evidently not be addressed in civil litigation over Covid-19 vaccines, which are now “mandatory” according to numerous federal, state and private business edicts. There is no accountability at any level for the potential harm caused to individuals, who may not even need the vaccines due to superior natural immunity or because of extremely low personal risk.
In addition, the vaccines do not prevent transmission, and indeed, may be spreading the virus. There is thus no moral, legal or practical grounds to mandate vaccines or “vaccine passports.” That the government is doing it anyway without any real accountability should alarm everyone.